Activity-Based Costing ABC: Definition, Example & Process
There may be more than one factor contributing to the total costs of an activity. For instance, the number of hours spent directly on labor drives most activities during product manufacturing. If the amount of money spent on labor is high, this will increase the overall cost of producing any goods or providing any services the company offers. The company uses ABC costing to allocate manufacturing overhead costs to each product line based on the activities consuming those costs. Identifying and assigning costs to each activity lets you better understand the cost of your products or services and make more informed decisions about pricing specific products and resource allocation.
Look at the overhead rates computed for the four activities in the table below.
What do you like about it over the more simplified traditional methods?
Of the problem mitigation suggestions noted here, the key point is to construct a highly targeted ABC system that produces the most critical information at a reasonable cost.
Management also is able to rank the cost to be reduced if they wish to join a price war with competitors.
This is the amount left over after the costs were deducted from the revenue.
(e) It results in more accurate cost calculation of a product or job. Therefore it is one of the effective methods of exercising cost control and can be used in designing either job costing system or process costing system. The ABC framework is being kept on hand as an optional resource for use when certain cost information is needed to facilitate the creation of a particular decision. Activity-based costing has become more practical because of the advent of software packages for business accounting, which has lowered the barrier to entry.
Distribution of Overhead Costs
Product 124 is a low volume item which requires certain activities such as special engineering, additional testing, and many machine setups because it is ordered in small quantities. A similar product, Product 366, is a high volume product—running continuously—and requires little attention and no special activities. If this company used traditional costing, it might allocate or “spread” all of its overhead to products based on the number of machine hours. This will result in little overhead cost allocated to Product 124, because it did not have many machine hours. However, it did demand lots of engineering, testing, and setup activities.
With it, planners may spend money on necessary or wasteful activities, leading to decreased efficiency and increased costs. Employees will try to conceal any unused or wasted time they have spent at work, which can lead to inaccurate data regarding costs. When asked to report on the duration of the work activities they participated in, many people divide their entire day, even though it is doubtful that they worked every minute of the day. This could potentially impact costs, but it all depends on how many people you have working for you. Installations of the activity-based costing system across large portions of an organization can take several years and require a significant amount of labor.
What are some common mistakes made when using activity-based costing?
Similarly, you might consider creating cost pools for each distribution channel, or for each facility. If production batches are of greatly varying lengths, then consider creating cost pools at the batch level, so that you can adequately assign costs based on batch size. Create cost pools for those costs incurred to provide services to other parts of the company, rather than directly supporting a company’s products or services. The contents of secondary cost pools typically include computer services and administrative salaries, and similar costs. These costs are later allocated to other cost pools that more directly relate to products and services. There may be several of these secondary cost pools, depending upon the nature of the costs and how they will be allocated.
This information can be used to allocate costs more accurately using activity-based costing. Activity-based costing can be a helpful tool for improving cost management. However, it is crucial to understand that ABC is just one cost allocation method and is not always the most accurate. In some cases, other methods, such as traditional costing, may provide more accurate results. While not mandatory, using appropriate costing methods is a critical component of ABC.
Act on the Information- Activity-Based Costing Process
Activity-based costing should not be considered a replacement for job or process costing; rather, it should be regarded as one of the most effective tools for refining a costing system. Based on this calculation, the activity-based cost for product design is $10 per hour. The cost driver for cutting fabric is the total yards of fabric used. Let’s say Trendy Clothing uses 2,000 yards of fabric for its T-shirts. If the answer is yes, you might want to start using activity-based costing (ABC). Moving from a traditional system to an ABC system is a big undertaking that will require many hours of research, setting up software to track expenses and maintenance.
The main focus is on activities performed on a particular product during its production.
Imagine the activities involved in making a simple product like a pizza—ordering, receiving and inspecting materials, making the dough, putting on the ingredients, baking, and so forth.
To implement activity-based costing effectively, managers must first identify the activities that are the most critical drivers of costs.
Learn why so many businesses use activity-based costing and how to determine if it’s right for your business.
ABC looks at how much the company spends to produce a particular product.
ABC helps you determine the expenses you spend and the costs you incur.
Under the activity-based approach, the unit cost card gives different unit product costs for each product. (c) Over a period of time, the ABC will tend to standardise the cost of activities related to a particular product or process. But in practice there will be differences in set-up time, production run, and meeting a delivery order for the product or process, as well as for different products. Implementation of ABC in service industry is difficult as the tracing of costs to service delivery may result in too many cost drivers. ABC provides more reliable data relating to activity driving costs which helps managers to improve product and process value. In a service environment, the allocation of costs to service delivery may not be easy.
What challenges need to be considered when implementing activity-based costing?
In contrast, Product 366 will be allocated an enormous amount of overhead (due to all those machine hours), but it demanded little overhead activity. The result will be a miscalculation activity based costing examples of each product’s true cost of manufacturing overhead. Activity based costing will overcome this shortcoming by assigning overhead on more than the one activity, running the machine.
As you can imagine, using just one cost driver can lead to inaccurate cost measurements. In traditional costing system, overhead costs are assumed to be influenced by only units produced. It means, in traditional costing system, cost of batch level, product level and facility level activities is fixed costs, i.e., costs of these do not change as production volume changes. Unit-based cost systems apportion fixed overhead to individual products and variable overheads are directly assigned to products using the base of number of units produced.
Without ABC, the cost per unit is $0.40 regardless of the number of units in each batch. With its bid price based on manufacturing overhead of $0.40—but a true cost of $0.46—the company may end up doing lots of production for little or no profit. Activity based costing (ABC) assigns manufacturing overhead costs to products in a more logical manner than the traditional approach of simply allocating costs on the basis of machine hours. Activity based costing first assigns costs to the activities that are the real cause of the overhead. It then assigns the cost of those activities only to the products that are actually demanding the activities.
I am an Associate Professor and I have significant experience in condition-based maintenance, machining process control, machining metal matrix composites, optimal replacement, equipment diagnostics and prognostics, knowledge-based training, manufacturing process, maintenance management.